|
Basically, there are two ways to make up for lost time and have adequate savings for retirement. The first is to take action that can result in a larger nest egg before retirement. The second is to take action to reduce the amount of savings required after retirement. The following eight preretirement strategies, explained in detail, are intended to result in increased retirement income.
Increase Contributions to Increase Retirement Savings
A recent study found that Americans contribute an average of 6.8% of their pay to 401(k) retirement plans far less than the maximum annual limit for many people. Thus, a clear catch-up strategy is to kick savings up a notch by contributing more to tax-deferred 401(k), 403(b), and Section 457 plans. The best times to do this are when you receive a raise, or other increase in income, or when household expenses, such as a car loan or child-care expenses, end.
Some tax-deferred plans also include matching employer contributions. For every dollar you save, your employer might kick in another 25 cents, 50 cents, or even a dollar, up to a certain percentage of your pay (for example, 6%). If you are not saving the amount required to earn the maximum match from your employer, you are essentially throwing away free money.
Table 4 shows the amount late savers can accumulate by age 65 by saving 2% of earnings annually or by a 1% contribution from you and a 1% match from your employer. The analysis assumes that savings earn a 7% average annual return and that a workers initial contribution is based on his or her current salary (for example, 2% of $30,000 is $600) and remains constant over time. If earnings and hence, retirement plan contributions, increase, the amount accumulated will be even higher. Taxes and inflation are ignored for simplicity.
Table 4
Savings at Age 65 from an Additional 2% Contribution to Tax-Deferred Savings
|
Worker's
|
Age That Worker Begins Saving Additional 2% of Pay
|
|
Annual Salary
|
40
|
45
|
50
|
55
|
|
$ 20,000
|
$25,300
|
$16,398
|
$10,052
|
$5,527
|
|
$ 30,000
|
$37,949
|
$24,597
|
$15,077
|
$8,290
|
|
$ 40,000
|
$50,599
|
$32,796
|
$20,103
|
$11,053
|
|
$ 50,000
|
$63,249
|
$40,996
|
$25,129
|
$13,816
|
Source: Future value of annuity table factors multiplied by 2% of four different salary levels with deposits held constant through age 65.
The Employee Benefit Research Institutes annual Retirement Confidence Survey consistently indicates that about half of American workers, both current savers and non-savers alike, believe it is possible to save $20 or $20 more weekly for retirement. While saving $20 per week does not seem like much, it results in more than $1,000 per year, plus earnings provided by compound interest. Table 5, below, shows the impact of saving an additional $20 per week. As you can see, seemingly small amounts can grow into substantial sums.
Table 5
Impact of Saving an Additional $20 Per Week
|
Number of Years of Savings
|
5% Average Return
|
10% Average Return
|
|
10 years
|
$13,700
|
$18,200
|
|
20 years
|
$36,100
|
$65,500
|
|
30 years
|
$72,600
|
$188,200
|
Source: Retirement Confidence Survey, Employee Benefit Research Institute
Case Study
John and Elizabeth Bennett, both age 45, each contribute an additional 1% of their $40,000 annual salaries to their 401(k) plans. Their employer matches their contribution equally up to the first 5% of pay. Assuming a 7% average annual return on their investments, in a diversified portfolio, at age 65 both spouses will have $32,796. Together, theyll have more than $65,000 additional savings simply by saving $800 each per year. On a weekly basis, their $800 deposits amount to about $15, which they found by reducing some expenses.
Worksheet 1: Savings Resulting from Additional Tax-Deferred Contributions
Resources
- Use retirement savings calculators to perform calculations with different amounts of hypothetical savings. Visit the Money magazine Web site at http://money.cnn.com/pf.
- Consult with your workplace human resources office to determine how much money you are eligible to contribute to a tax-deferred savings plan, how much employer match is available, and the historical performance of different plan investment options. Attend workplace investment seminars, if offered, to increase your knowledge.
Accelerate Debt Repayment and Spend Less
Saving for retirement and reducing debt are closely related. The sooner outstanding debt is repaid, the sooner monthly payments can be reallocated to retirement investments. In other words, compound interest will begin to work for you, rather than against you. Adding even small amounts to the minimum payment due on a credit card can produce dramatic results. Interest costs are reduced and the time required to repay a debt is shortened considerably.
According to the book Slash Your Debt, by Detweiler, Eisenson, & Castleman, saving and then adding your daily pocket change to minimum debt payments can make a big difference in borrowing costs as shown in Table 6. The analysis assumes three different outstanding balances, a 17% credit card interest rate, and a minimum payment of 2% of the outstanding balance.
Table 6
Saving Interest Payments and Time
By making credit card payments beyond the required minimum, you can save the following amounts in interest and reduce the years in the repayment period.
|
Additional Daily
Payment
|
$5,000
Balance
|
$10,000
Balance
|
$15,000
Balance
|
|
10 cents
|
$2,25711 years
|
$3,06012 years
|
$3,54512 years
|
|
25 cents
|
$4,14819 years
|
$5,97020 years
|
$7,11221 years
|
|
$1.00
|
$7,62430 years
|
$12,61535 years
|
$16,16836 years
|
Source: Slash Your Debt by Detweiler. Eisenson, & Castleman (1999, Financial Literacy Center)
If you have a balance of $5,000 on a 17% credit card and pay only the minimum required each month, it could take 40 years to pay and your total interest charge would be $16,304. By applying just 10 cents a day more to paying off your balance, you could save $2,257 in interest costs and pay off your balance 11 years sooner. Plus, once youve paid off the debt, you can start investing that same amount of money and start earning interest instead of paying it.
Additional ways to accelerate debt repayment and reduce the cost of borrowing include:
- Contact creditors and request a lower interest rate. Sometimes, they will comply because it costs them more than $100 in marketing costs to replace you as a customer.
- Transfer outstanding balances to a lower-rate credit card and continue paying the amount that you paid before. Do be aware of balance transfer fees (such as 3% of the transferred amount).
- Transfer a high-interest credit card balance to a lower-rate secured or unsecured personal loan and pay it off in three to five years.
- Refrain from incurring new debt if your ratio of monthly consumer debt payments to net income is 15% or higher (example: $350 of consumer debt ÷ $2,000 net pay = 17.5%).
Many county Cooperative Extension offices provide free or low cost computerized debt reduction analyses called PowerPay. The program assumes that, when one creditor has been paid in full, that payment amount is then added to payments due to remaining creditors. The greatest savings usually occur by repaying the highest interest rate debts first (for example, 22% store credit cards). It also assumes that you do not accumulate new debt during the payoff process.
Most late savers can reduce household spending to find extra dollars to save for retirement and/or reduce debt. Use Worksheet 2 to estimate what you could save each month and during an entire year by cutting your spending in various expense categories.
Worksheet 2: Finding Money to Invest for Retirement
Resources
- Use one of the many loan and budget calculators on the Internet; for example, Credit Union National Associations Web site (http://cucalc.cuna.org/calc_index_.html?sub_id=0) to make estimates of the amount of money you can save by paying off debt quickly and reducing expenses.
- Read the book Slash Your Debt by Gerri Detweiler et al. to gain an appreciation of the amount of money you can save with various debt reduction strategies.
Moonlighting If you decide to moonlight, be sure to set aside most if not all of the additional income for retirement. A second job, consulting, or self-employment through a home-based business in addition to your day job provides several benefits for catch-up savers:
- Increased household income and additional funds for retirement savings.
- Development of new career skills and a possible bridge job to work at following retirement.
- Access to tax-deferred SEP and Keogh plans designed for self-employed persons.
- Reduced taxable income with deductions for business-related expenses (for example, professional dues and travel) that might be limited as an employee.
This strategy is not for everyone, however. A major disadvantage of moonlighting is the time required for working additional hours. Plus, youll need to know a trade or have job skills (such as computer skills) that can transfer to another work experience. Also be prepared for any associated costs such as travel and equipment purchases.
Nevertheless, moonlighting can result in significant additional savings for retirement. Table 7 indicates the amount you can accumulate over a two-, 10-, 16-, and 20-year period with an annual deposit of $5,000 of annual income derived from moonlighting.
Table 7
Retirement Savings Possible from Saving $5,000 of Income Annually from Moonlighting
|
Number of Years
into the Future
|
5% Average
Annual Return
|
7% Average
Annual Return
|
9% Average
Annual Return
|
|
2
|
$10,250
|
$10,350
|
$10,450
|
|
10
|
$62,890
|
$69,082
|
$75,965
|
|
16
|
$118,288
|
$139,440
|
$165,017
|
|
20
|
$165,330
|
$204,978
|
$255,800
|
Worksheet 3: Supplemental Income Planning Worksheet
Resources
- Consult your local chapter of SCORE (Service Corps of Retired Executives) for free business counseling. Other helpful resources for new business owners include the U.S. Small Business Administration, business departments of community colleges, and local Chambers of Commerce.
- Use a financial calculator or the What Will My Savings Be Worth? calculator on the Readers Digest Web site (www.rd.com/tools/alltoollist.jhtml#Money) to determine how much money you could save from earnings by moonlighting.
Invest Assertively
Historical investment data consistently uphold the following two principles:
- The more stock investors own, the higher their average annual return over time and the greater their portfolios volatility (ups and downs of share prices). U.S. stocks have earned more than 10% since 1926 compared to about 5% for Treasury bonds and less than 4% for Treasury bills, according to Ibbotson Associates, the Chicago investment research firm. Past investment performance is no guarantee of future earnings, however.
- Investment volatility is reduced over long time periods (10 or more years), a principle known as time diversification.
Another catch-up strategy, albeit with increased investment risk, is to place more stock in your portfolio before and/or after retirement. Remember, your investment time horizon is your entire life expectancy, not your retirement date. If you are 45, for example, you may have another 15 to 20 years before you retire and another 20 to 25 years of life expectancy afterwards. Thats plenty of time for compound interest to work its magic and to ride out painful market downturns such as those experienced during the 1970s and early 2000s.
As noted previously, the Rule of 72 estimates how long it takes a sum of money to double at different interest rates. To illustrate how decisions about what to invest ina process known as asset allocationaffect the growth of an investment, consider the following example based on the Rule of 72.
Two 50-year-old workers change jobs and decide to invest their $20,000 lump sum distributions from a 401(k) plan into rollover IRAs. Worker A invests the money very conservatively in bonds, money market funds, and Certificates of Deposit (CDs) that earn a 4.5% average annual return. Worker B invests in a total stock market index fund that tracks a broad U.S. stock market index. The mutual fund earns a 9% average annual return, which is twice the return earned by Worker A. Ignoring taxes for simplicity, their rollover IRAs would grow as follows through retirement. Note that Worker B, with a higher average return, has four times as much money as Worker A because his or her savings doubles twice as often as Worker A, or four times instead of two.
Table 8
Comparison of Investment Growth at Two Interest Rates
|
Worker A
72/4.5 = 16 Years to Double Money Age of Worker
|
Age of Worker
|
Worker B
72/9 = 8 Years to Double Money
|
|
$20,000
|
50
|
$20,000
|
|
58
|
$40,000
|
|
$40,000
|
66
|
$80,000
|
|
74
|
$160,000
|
|
$80,000
|
82
|
$320,000
|
Note: This example is for illustration purposes only and does not imply the future investment performance of any particular type of investment. The rates of return were assumed to illustrate the effect of the Rule of 72.
Of course, not everyone is comfortable with the ups and downs of the stock and bond markets. If you are a very conservative investor, this catch-up strategy is probably not for you. You can lose your principal and investment earnings are not guaranteed. But it probably makes sense to have at least a portion of your retirement savings in stocks or stock mutual funds, so you have some protection against inflation.
Be aware of your investment risk tolerancehow much you can afford to loseand how well you can sleep at night after hearing about market downturns. Never invest in anything you dont understand or feel comfortable owning. Understand the risks involved with each type of investment. Remember, a conservative investment with no fluctuation may seem risk free, but it may not provide enough growth to allow you to retire as planned.
Case Study
Soledad Ruiz, 52, just received a $14,000 inheritance. She decided to pay off the $4,000 balance on an 18% credit cardthe equivalent of earning an 18% return, risk free and tax free. She places the remaining $10,000 in a low-expense stock index fund. The fund averaged more than a 10% return over the past 10 and 20 years. At a 10% return, money doubles every 7.2 years, although she understands that past performance is no guarantee of future returns. If the mutual fund continues to perform as well as it did in the past, Ruiz could have $40,000 by age 67.
Worksheet 4: Investment Risk and Planning Analysis
Resources
Maximize Tax Breaks and Reduce Investment Expenses
Compound interest works best when you can eliminate, reduce, or defer income taxes and keep investment expenses to a minimum. High income taxes and high expenses reduce investment performance. Table 9 shows the growth of a $10,000 lump sum investment under three different scenarios: no taxable gain on investment earnings (for example, tax-free investments such as municipal bonds and Roth IRAs), deferred capital gains taxes paid at the 20% long-term capital gains (LTCG) rate, and taxes paid each year at a combined 31% federal/state tax rate. The calculation assumes a 10% average annual return. Note that the gap in asset growth among the three investment scenarios widens substantially over time.
Table 9
Growth of $10,000 Savings at 10% in Three Income Tax Scenarios
|
Investment
Time
Period
in Years
|
No Taxable
Gain on
Investment
Earnings
|
Deferred Capital
Gain Taxed at
a 20%
LTCG Rate
|
Capital Gain
Taxed Annually
in a Taxable
Account
|
|
10 Years
|
$25,937
|
$22,750
|
$19,488
|
|
20 Year
|
$67,275
|
$55,820
|
$37,980
|
|
30 Year
|
$174,494
|
$141,595
|
$74,017
|
Source: Updegrave, W. (2000, April). Taxing Matters. Money, 29(4), pp. 71-75.
Tax-exempt investments usually provide a greater return to investors above the 10% and 15% federal tax brackets. To determine your marginal tax bracket, based on taxable income and tax filing status, consult the tax tables in your annual income tax form mailing from the IRS or visit the Web site at www.rce.rutgers.edu/money/taxinfo/default.asp. Or, visit the IRS Web site at www.irs.gov.
You must hold investments for more than a year to take advantage of the 20% long-term capital gains tax rate (10% for investors in the 10% and 15% tax brackets). These rates have decreased further to 18% (8% for investors in the 10% and 15% tax brackets) for assets acquired after Dec. 31, 2000, and held for more than five years.
The timing of a tax-advantaged investment also affects the amount that accumulates. Individual Retirement Account (IRA) contributions, for example, can be made on the first business day of each year up until April 15 of the following year. For example, if you saved $2,000 annually in an IRA during the 20 years from 1981 through 2000, you would have accumulated an additional $26,000 by making contributions early in the tax year rather than waiting until the deadline of April 15 of the following year. (This example assumes an investment asset allocation of 60% in stocks, 30% in bonds, and 10% in Treasury bills.)
Catch-up investors should also pay particular attention to investment expenses. Costs matter, especially over time. For example, say you invest $25,000 in a mutual fund that earns 10% with an expense ratio (expenses as a percentage of fund assets) of 0.2%. Say your friend also invests $25,000 and earns 10%but the fund charges 1.3%. Over 20 years, you would earn $31,701 more than your friend! The average expense ratio for mutual funds in 2001 was 1.34% ($13.40 per $1,000 of assets). Many investors are paying more than this, however, particularly for mutual funds that charge a 12b-1 fee (up to 1% of assets for marketing and distribution expenses each year).
Tax efficiency matters, too. While investors cant control their investment performance, they can select tax-efficient mutual funds that seek to minimize expenses and taxable distributions that are passed on to investors.
Case Study
Jan Eckert is 51, recently divorced, and getting a late start saving for retirement. She kept the family home in her divorce settlement but had no retirement savings. Determined to make up for lost time, Jan recently opened a Roth IRA in a low-expense stock index fund with her $1,000 year-end bonus and a $2,500 cash transfer from her ex-husband. In addition she found $100 a month to invest each month by reducing her spending. In 15 years, when she retires at age 66, Jans $3,500 lump sum and monthly deposits will have grown to $46,370, assuming an 8% average annual return.
Worksheet 5: Tax-Advantaged Investment Analysis
Resources
- Visit the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions Web site at www.sec.gov and click on Interactive Tools. The Mutual Fund Cost Calculator (to compare mutual fund costs) and the Tax-Free vs. Taxable Yield Calculator will be of particular interest to late savers.
- The Retirement Catch-Up Guide by Ellen Hoffman (2000, Newmarket Press). Chapter 6 provides information about tax-deferred retirement savings plans.
Diversify and Dollar-Cost Average
Late savers may be tempted to invest in a few hot stocks or mutual funds to make up for lost time. This is rarely a good idea. People in their late 40s through 60s simply dont have much time to recoup their losses because they are so close to retirement. The risk in limiting investments to just a handful of companies or market sectors, such as technology, is the greater potential for loss that comes with reduced diversification.
A much safer investment strategy is to diversify which means to distribute your money among different investments to reduce the risk of loss from a decline in any one investment. There are several easy ways to diversify investments:
- Place money in several asset classes (for example, stocks, bonds, cash, and real estate).
- Choose different investments within each asset class (for example, stock from different industries).
- Purchase investments, such as mutual funds and exchange-traded funds, that contain diversified portfolios of stocks or bonds.
- Purchase stock and bond index funds that track broad market indices.
- Purchase an asset allocation fund that includes three asset classesstock, bonds, and cash.
Another important investment strategy is dollar-cost averaging the practice of investing equal amounts of money at a regular time interval (such as $50 per month), regardless of whether the investments value is moving up or down. A common example is the amount workers contribute to tax-deferred retirement plans each pay period. Another example is monthly deposits that are automatically debited from a bank account and transferred into a mutual fund investment plan.
Dollar-cost averaging reduces the average cost of shares over time. Investors acquire more shares in periods of declining share prices and fewer shares in periods of higher prices. When dollar-cost averaging is practiced over long time periods, time diversification reduces investment risk. Table 10 shows a simple illustration of dollar-cost averaging. The average cost per share is $7.06 ($300 divided by 42.50 shares).
Table 10
Illustration of Dollar-Cost Averaging
|
Time Period
|
Regular
Investment
|
Share
Price
|
Shares
Acquired
|
|
Month 1
|
$50.00
|
$10.00
|
5.00
|
|
Month 2
|
$50.00
|
$8.00
|
6.25
|
|
Month 3
|
$50.00
|
$5.00
|
10.00
|
|
Month 4
|
$50.00
|
$10.00
|
10.00
|
|
Month 5
|
$50.00
|
$8.00
|
6.25
|
|
Month 6
|
$50.00
|
$10.00
|
5.00
|
|
Total
|
$300.00
|
|
42.50
|
Worksheet 6: Personal Dollar-Cost Averaging Tracking Form
Resources
- See Investing For Your Future: A Cooperative Extension System Basic Investing Home Study Course, available online at www.investing.rutgers.edu (2002, Natural Resource, Agriculture, and Engineering Service, Ithaca, N.Y). Unit 2 discusses basic investment terminology and includes an example of dollar-cost averaging.
- Investing For Success is an investment program developed to increase the investment knowledge of African-Americans. Sponsored by the National Urban League, the Coalition of Black InvestorsInvestment Education Fund, and the Investment Company Institute, its online components include brochures, worksheets, and calculators found at www.icief.org.
Have Multiple Savings Plans
Thanks to the 2001 tax law, contributions to different savings plans are no longer interdependent. Rules that coordinated the annual limit for contributions to tax-deferred 457 plans with contributions to other types of employer plans have been repealed. Thus, if you can afford it and have access through your employer, you can contribute the maximum amount allowed to more than one type of tax-deferred retirement plan, such as a a 403(b) plan and a 457 plan.
For example, in 2002, workers under age 50 can contribute up to $22,000 (2 x $11,000) and workers 50 and older can contribute up to and $24,000 (2 x $12,000) to a combination of tax-deferred plans. These limits will rise each year, as explained in Table 2.
In addition to tax-deferred plans, workers can also contribute the maximum annual amount allowed plus catch-up provisions (for those age 50 or older) to a Traditional or Roth IRA. Depending on your income, you may or may not get a tax deduction for contributions to a Traditional IRA. Roth IRAs are nondeductible but provide tax-free earnings after age 59 1/2 if you hold the account for at least five years. If you dont qualify for a Traditional IRA deduction and your income is too high to contribute to a Rothmore than $110,000 for single taxpayers and $160,000 for married couples filing jointlyyou can still contribute to a nondeductible IRA, no matter how much money you earn.
Preserve Lump Sum Distributions
When they change jobs, two-thirds of workers spend all or part of their lump-sum distributions from the employer instead of rolling them over into an IRA or other tax-deferred savings plan. Research indicates that the smaller the distribution, the more likely it is to be spenteven though taxes and penalties may be owed. Workers who believe that small distributions wont make a difference at retirement are badly mistaken, as the following example from the Employee Benefit Research Institute indicates.
Case Study
Joe Grasso changed jobs every 10 years throughout his career (at ages 25, 35, 45, and 55). After leaving each job, he received a $5,000 lump-sum distribution. If he rolled over and preserved all four distributions, he would have $193,035 at age 65 (assuming an 8% average annual return). If he cashed out his distribution at age 25, while rolling over the final three, he would have less than half that amount ($84,413) at age 65. If he cashed out the first two and three distributions, he would have only $34,099 and $10,795, respectively.
|
|
|